We In contrast Previous vs New Condos in Certainly one of Singapore’s Priciest Neighbourhoods — Right here’s What We Discovered for Smaller Items

District 11 (D11) has some of the most famous high-end residential enclaves: think Newton, Novena, Watten Estate and Thomson. Here, the condo landscape has a wide-ranging mix of old and new projects alike; but thanks to its central location, even the oldest condos here can still fetch a premium. D11 is also one of the districts that draw both owner-occupiers as well as landlords, as proximity to the CBD ensures near-constant tenant demand. In light of that, does condo age matter in D11, and how much? Demand seems strong across the board anyway; so does it make sense to go for a lower $PSF, even in an ageing unit? Let’s take a closer look:

Quick Summary:

• Older condos in D11 have held their own, with many showing stronger growth than newer counterparts. Their larger unit sizes and lower entry prices continue to attract both home buyers and investors despite their age.
• One-bedders show weaker overall performance, but projects like Hillcrest Arcadia show that size and value can offset age. Its nearly 1,000 sq ft one-bedder unit at under $1 million was quite a find.
• Two-bedders remain the most balanced segment, with newer units leading in $PSF but older ones keeping pace in overall appreciation. Rental yields are strong on both ends, showing that age has limited impact on returns in D11.

Let’s start by looking at the overall performance of resale condos in D11

We’ll use resale transactions, to exclude any distortions from developer discounts:

Year	D11	All non-landed private properties
2014	$1,534	$1,215
2015	$1,481	$1,197
2016	$1,466	$1,248
2017	$1,677	$1,293
2018	$1,674	$1,323
2019	$1,563	$1,346
2020	$1,598	$1,280
2021	$1,704	$1,354
2022	$1,786	$1,473
2023	$1,936	$1,595
2024	$1,994	$1,681
Annualised	2.66%	3.30%

In terms of $PSF and percentage gain, condos in D11 have appreciated slower in the wider market. However, this is just a general snapshot. We need to look at the performance of 99-year leasehold properties, separately from freehold counterparts:

Year	D11	All non-landed private properties
2014	$1,417	$1,066
2015	$1,394	$1,051
2016	$1,366	$1,140
2017	$1,317	$1,123
2018	$1,517	$1,164
2019	$1,335	$1,189
2020	$1,447	$1,159
2021	$1,463	$1,227
2022	$1,678	$1,370
2023	$1,770	$1,516
2024	$1,799	$1,616
Annualised	2.42%	4.25%

Leasehold properties in D11 have also trailed the wider market, at least in terms of $PSF. This is partly due to D11 properties being pricier, on account of the central location (see the table above), so this results in slower percentage gains. 

For completeness, here’s a look at how the 999-year and freehold properties have performed:

Year	D11	All non-landed private properties
2014	$1,559	$1,385
2015	$1,493	$1,366
2016	$1,484	$1,393
2017	$1,745	$1,461
2018	$1,706	$1,524
2019	$1,612	$1,572
2020	$1,631	$1,488
2021	$1,752	$1,586
2022	$1,814	$1,709
2023	$1,974	$1,799
2024	$2,032	$1,855
Annualised	2.68%	2.97%

When it comes to freehold, the price gap for D11 (on a $PSF basis) is not as wide as compared to leasehold.

Now let’s get to the heart of our query: how well do older leasehold condos in D11 perform, compared to newer counterparts?

We’ll look at leasehold because these are the projects that are most susceptible to age (due to lease decay.) Our definition of “new” is projects that are 20 years old or younger, while “old” projects refer to those above the age of 20.

This is because most condos in Singapore seem to typically last around 19 to 24 years before redevelopment, making 20 years a good midpoint. It’s also conventionally accepted in the market that an “old” or “older” condo is one that’s past the 20 year mark. 

To maintain consistency, we’ll also define newer condos as projects with leases commencing between 1994 and 2014, and older condos as those with leases starting in 1993 or earlier. This ensures that we’re comparing the same set of developments across time. We’ll only use sub sale and resale transactions, to prevent distortions from developer discounts.

Year	New	Old	Difference
2014	$1,652	$1,057	$595
2015	$1,516	$1,027	$489
2016	$1,492	$834	$658
2017	$1,539	$888	$650
2018	$1,595	$952	$642
2019	$1,614	$970	$644
2020	$1,641	$960	$681
2021	$1,707	$1,021	$687
2022	$1,787	$1,179	$607
2023	$1,924	$1,244	$680
2024	$1,916	$1,253	$663
Annualised	1.49%	1.72%

Over the past decade, older projects have seen faster growth of 1.72 per cent, versus 1.49 per cent for newer counterparts. The gap between old and new has also widened over time.

That said, the lower $PSF of older properties often reflects their larger unit sizes, so their quantum may be much higher than newer ones. To get a clearer sense of this, let’s compare the actual quantum of the two:

Year	New	Old	Difference
2014	$2,722,217	$2,453,533	$268,684
2015	$1,843,995	$2,593,125	-$749,130
2016	$1,772,110	$2,323,667	-$551,557
2017	$1,873,160	$1,745,628	$127,532
2018	$2,169,425	$3,192,333	-$1,022,908
2019	$2,211,382	$2,331,269	-$119,887
2020	$2,050,475	$2,816,000	-$765,525
2021	$2,061,486	$2,941,861	-$880,375
2022	$2,358,851	$3,525,000	-$1,166,149
2023	$2,217,897	$2,810,833	-$592,936
2024	$2,432,232	$3,637,778	-$1,205,545
% increase from 2014 to 2024	-10.65%	48.27%

Interestingly, newer projects saw an overall price decline of about 10.65 per cent, while older properties rose by roughly 48.27 per cent. Also, for most of the past decade, older developments commanded higher average prices than newer ones – not the period from 2015 to 2022.

So far, this suggests demand for older, larger units has remained strong, while the market shrugged off newer condos entering at smaller sizes and a higher $PSF.

However, the transaction volume and type of units sold each year can skew averages, so we should check that next:

*Note: There are no freehold/999-year lease condos that are 20 years old or newer in D11, so we will exclude freehold from our comparison.

1-bedroom units

Average $PSF

Year	New	Old	Difference
2014	$1,961	$1,110	$851
2015	$1,959
2016	$1,707
2017	$1,821	$1,055	$766
2018	$1,795	$1,015	$780
2019	$1,806	$1,055	$751
2020	$1,633	$1,136	$498
2021	$1,793	$1,063	$729
2022	$1,882	1185	$697
2023	$1,960	$1,322	$638
2024	$1,966	$1,023	$943
Annualised	0.03%	-0.81%

One-bedders in D11, both old and new, have shown weak performance. The older counterparts fared worse with an average decline of 0.81 per cent, whilst newer counterparts saw flat price movement. 

Newer projects still consistently transacted at higher $PSF values, which is a market norm; so the $PSF gap between the older and newer one-bedders has widened over the decade. 

Now let’s look at the actual quantum of the one-bedders:

Average price

Year	New	Old	Difference
2014	$1,202,500	$875,000	$327,500
2015	$1,069,000
2016	$958,278
2017	$1,018,454	$663,363	$355,091
2018	$1,082,333	$940,000	$142,333
2019	$1,050,000	$893,333	$156,667
2020	$982,002	$1,045,000	-$62,998
2021	$1,049,089	$814,500	$234,589
2022	$1,042,259	$1,020,000	$22,259
2023	$1,135,500	$1,210,000	-$74,500
2024	$1,111,600	$980,000	$131,600
% increase from 2014 to 2024	-7.56%	12.00%

There’s a significant divergence in performance, with older one-bedders managing a 12 per cent increase, but newer ones seeing a decline of 7.56 per cent. 

The reason for this is evident when we look at unit sizes:

Average size (based on units transacted)

Year	New	Old
2014	619	813
2015	544
2016	564
2017	562	653
2018	606	926
2019	581	847
2020	603	921
2021	588	770
2022	556	851
2023	579	915
2024	566	958

Despite being classified as one-bedders, the older units have a square footage that can rival larger units. The average one-bedder size transacted in 2024, for older properties, is  a massive 958 sq ft. 

Even setting aside GFA harmonisation (which would make the older ones average about 900+ sq ft., deducting six per cent for air-con ledges), the size of the older one-bedders are what we’d consider three-bedders today. 

For D11, the market shows a clear preference for these older, larger, and hence more versatile one-bedders.

These are the total number of transactions we looked at: 

No. of transactions

Year	New	Old
2014	2	4
2015	2
2016	5
2017	13	3
2018	3	1
2019	2	3
2020	7	2
2021	9	4
2022	3	2
2023	6	1
2024	5	1

Let’s look at the specific project names, for one-bedders transacted in 2024

New

Project	Average $PSF	Average price	Average size	No. of unit sold	Lease start year
SOLEIL @ SINARAN	$1,966	$1,111,600	566	5	2006

Old

Project	Average $PSF	Average price	Average size	No. of unit sold	Lease start year
HILLCREST ARCADIA	$1,023	$980,000	958	1	1975

The size and price difference makes it clear why the majority of buyers lean toward the older side. Hillcrest Arcadia offers a massive 958 sq ft at a quantum of below $1 million, which is a very rare price point in today’s market. Conversely, the newer Soleil @ Sinaran pushes past $1.1 million for a mere 566 sq ft. 

For those curious about the size, it’s because Hillcrest Arcadia (completed in 1980 with a lease from 1975) was from the earliest generation of condos; back then, one-bedders were not seen as merely compact units for tenants. They were still considered a form of high-end living (a “bungalow in the sky” concept), hence the huge unit sizes.

Here’s a look a look at the side-by-side performance between the two:

Year	HILLCREST ARCADIA	SOLEIL @ SINARAN
2014	$1,110	$2,262
2015		$1,959
2016		$1,738
2017	$1,055	$1,880
2018	$1,015	$1,924
2019	$1,055	$1,806
2020	$1,136	$1,681
2021	$1,063	$1,869
2022	$1,185	$1,882
2023	$1,322	$1,951
2024	$1,023	$1,966
Annualised	-0.81%	-1.39%

While both projects saw a decline in $PSF, it was still the newer one-bedder (Soleil) that saw a steeper drop.

We’d normally also compare rental yields, but we can’t for this project as Soleil @ Sinaran has no record of rentals for the one-bedders.

2-bedroom units

Average $PSF

Year	New	Old	Difference
2014	$1,590	$1,143	$447
2015	$1,539	$1,003	$536
2016	$1,594	$929	$665
2017	$1,549	$977	$572
2018	$1,648	$1,012	$636
2019	$1,750	$1,042	$708
2020	$1,763	$1,008	$755
2021	$1,708	$1,082	$626
2022	$1,838	$1,140	$698
2023	$1,962	$1,252	$710
2024	$1,995
Annualised (2014 to 2023)	2.36%	1.02%

There were no transactions for older two-bedders in 2024, so we’ll base the comparison on annualised growth from 2014 to 2023 instead.

Over this period, newer two-bedders recorded an annualised price growth of 2.36 per cent, compared to 1.02 per cent for older units. As expected, newer projects consistently transacted at a higher $PSF throughout the decade, and the gap between the two has widened. 

Two-bedders have generally seen better results than one-bedders in D11 though; whether they’re older or newer.

Now let’s look at their quantum:

Average price

Year	New	Old	Difference
2014	$1,533,333	$1,275,000	$258,333
2015	$1,508,222	$1,425,000	$83,222
2016	$1,543,991	$1,320,000	$223,991
2017	$1,534,286	$1,106,857	$427,429
2018	$1,684,995	$1,438,000	$246,995
2019	$1,815,462	$1,480,333	$335,128
2020	$1,775,700	$1,400,000	$375,700
2021	$1,754,125	$1,538,000	$216,125
2022	$1,836,399	$1,620,000	$216,399
2023	$1,973,163	$1,670,000	$303,163
2024	$2,027,667
% increase from 2014 to 2023	28.68%	30.98%

Both new and old two-bedders saw notable appreciation in average price. Newer units rose by about 28.7 per cent, while older ones climbed higher at 31 per cent.

The fact that older two-bedders kept pace (and even edged ahead of newer ones in percentage growth) highlights that D11’s older projects can still perform.

Again, spaciousness may be another factor:

Average size (based on units transacted)

Year	New	Old
2014	965	1158
2015	981	1421
2016	969	1421
2017	991	1180
2018	1030	1421
2019	1037	1421
2020	1005	1389
2021	1030	1421
2022	1004	1421
2023	1006	1335
2024	1019

These unit sizes would be considered three or even four-bedders today; and we can see that the older projects are consistently larger.

This is the total number of transactions we looked at: 

No. of transactions

Year	New	Old
2014	6	2
2015	9	1
2016	13	1
2017	21	7
2018	24	1
2019	13	3
2020	14	1
2021	24	1
2022	22	1
2023	17	2
2024	12

Now let’s look at the specific projects by name:

New

Project	Average $PSF	Average price	Average size	No. of unit sold	Lease start year
AMARYLLIS VILLE	$1,884	$1,816,539	964	7	1997
ROCHELLE AT NEWTON	$1,915	$1,938,000	1012	1	2008
SOLEIL @ SINARAN	$2,028	$2,098,889	1038	9	2006

Old

Project	Average $PSF	Average price	Average size	No. of unit sold	Lease start year
HILLCREST ARCADIA	$1,252	$1,670,000	1335	2	1975

From here, you’d notice that resale prices among the newer condos are quite close to new launch prices in 2025:

Average prices ranged from about $1.82 million at Amaryllis Ville to $2.1 million at Soleil @ Sinaran. This is about the price of a new launch two-bedder today (around $1.8 million to $2 million), but the aforementioned projects would give you more space for an almost similar price tag. 

By contrast, the only older development with two-bedder transactions was Hillcrest Arcadia, where units averaged $1,670,000; but the 1,335 sq ft layout would be on par with a three or even four-bedder by newer standards. So in this sense, the price discrepancy isn’t too surprising. 

Next, let’s examine how the two-bedders in these individual projects have performed over the past decade. 

Year	SOLEIL @ SINARAN	AMARYLLIS VILLE	HILLCREST ARCADIA	ROCHELLE AT NEWTON
2014	$1,837	$1,540	$936
2015	$1,741	$1,508	$1,003	$1,522
2016	$1,778	$1,479	$929
2017	$1,712	$1,468	$803	$1,463
2018	$1,733	$1,528	$1,012
2019	$1,829	$1,490	$1,042
2020	$1,820	$1,554	$1,008
2021	$1,751	$1,684	$1,082	$1,654
2022	$1,902	$1,817	$1,140	$1,790
2023	$2,028	$1,884	$1,252	$1,915
2024	$2,019	$1,996		$1,917
Annualised (2014 to 2023)	1.11%	2.26%	3.28%	–

Since there were no transactions in certain years, we’ll focus only on developments with recorded transactions in both 2014 and 2023.

Interestingly, Hillcrest Arcadia – despite being the oldest project above –  recorded the highest annualised price growth. As we saw above, its comparatively low entry price and larger unit sizes likely keep it attractive, even if it is older. 

Next, let’s take a look at how the rental yields compare across these same projects. 

Project	Average price in 2023	Average monthly rent (June 2024 – June 2025)	Rental yield
ROCHELLE AT NEWTON	$1,938,000	$4,817	2.98%
AMARYLLIS VILLE	$1,816,539	$5,057	3.34%
HILLCREST ARCADIA	$1,670,000	$4,775	3.43%
SOLEIL @ SINARAN	$2,098,889	$6,613	3.78%

It’s interesting that Soleil @ Sinaran, despite having the highest average price, also achieved the highest rental yield at 3.78 per cent. Perhaps this is due to its proximity to Novena MRT station (NSL), or the proximity of Tan Tock Sent Hospital.

(Whilst not as favoured by owner-occupiers, landlords may favour proximity to hospitals, as the sizeable foreign staff in healthcare make good potential tenants.)

Hillcrest Arcadia recorded the second-highest yield at 3.43 per cent, which is largely on account of its lower unit price. 

Conclusion:

Overall, the data shows that newer condos in D11 continue to command higher $PSF prices; but the performance of older developments – particularly Hillcrest Arcadia – suggests that age alone isn’t a barrier to strong appreciation or rental demand.

Older projects tend to offer larger living spaces at lower entry prices, and this can look especially attractive in the 2025 market (e.g., Hillcrest’s sub-$1 million pricing for a one-bedder that’s almost the size of a three-bedder.)

We also see a marked preference for two-bedders as opposed to one-bedders, based on overall performance over the decade. A main takeaway here, however, is that buyers and investors don’t need to be too worried about age in D11 – in fact, the larger and older projects can be more attractive. 

Next up, join us on Stacked Pro and as well look up the results for three and four-bedders in D11, and whether age has any effect on them. If you’d like to get in touch for a more in-depth consultation, you can do so here.