sgcommercialguru: it works!!

Home

This Hasn’t Occurred In The Singapore Property Market In 20 Years…




5 min read

Zero bids for a GLS site, I never thought I’d see the day.

dog

This GLS site at Upper Thomson, next to Springleaf MRT station, has attracted a record-breaking zero bids from developers. This is a 53,729 sqm site, with a gross plot ratio of 2.2 that is expected to yield around 540 new units. However, it comes with strings attached (which was probably also one of the dealbreakers): 

There must be a childcare facility (a minimum of 1,000 sqm must be reserved for this), and 4,700 sqm has to be set aside for SA2 apartments. SA2 units are a new, untried concept – these “long stay” serviced apartments have a minimum lease of three months, unlike the usual one week for serviced units. 

This is, incidentally, the first time in 20 years that a GLS site has found no takers; and it’s hot on the heels of the failed Marina Gardens Crescent site sale

seriously

To some degree, this may be due to the requirement for long-stay serviced units. Consider the perspective of an owner-investor, or a landlord: would you really buy a condo unit if, right downstairs or in the block across from you, there are competing serviced units? And not just the serviced units for short-term stayers (i.e. a few weeks or a month), but tenants who are likely staying as long as yours, given the three-month lease. 

On the flip side, I don’t foresee many companies being too interested in running these serviced apartments either. They too, have little interest in engaging nearby landlords in a price war; especially not in the current economic climate.

Owner-investors, who may never rent out the unit, also have to care: in the end, the resale value of the property is still impacted by this consideration (e.g., it filters out future landlords as potential buyers). 

Is that the sole reason no one’s bidding though?

I doubt so. For the past two decades, we’ve seen there’s almost always someone willing to try their luck – from developers with depleted land banks and lack of choice to certain foreign developers who are willing to work on razor-thin margins. There always seemed to be someone willing to take a punt – even if it was at a low price. After all, the worst that could happen would be the bid being rejected altogether if it was the sole bid (like the Marina Gardens Crescent site). 

As such, it really is quite a shock to see zero interest altogether.

(This may also somewhat be due to the supposed over-saturation of new launch condos at Lentor and the recent awarding of the Upper Thomson Parcel B site). 

first for everything

In other times, perhaps when developers were less squeezed, I can see some still being willing to take the risks. But when you couple the requirements with a five-year ABSD limit, along with recent changes like gross floor harmonisation*, rising interest rates, and higher Land Betterment Charges, developers are left with no room for error. 

And the rejection of this novel land parcel is the same reason we see less variety among condos today: few have an interest in trying new things, when there’s a potential multi-million dollar loss attached to it. 

In a way, while it is still shocking, there were signs that this was coming. The recent GLS land sites have been drawing fewer bids – the River Valley Green GLS site only received 2, while the Zion Parcel A received just one.  

*Preventing developers from min-maxing profits, such as with big bay windows, strata void spaces, and air-con ledges, has an impact on their bottom line. 

This also brings into question the three upcoming sites

Land parcels in Dairy Farm, Tengah, and Bayshore are also up for grabs soon. And of the three, only Bayshore seems to be drawing some confidence so far; probably on account of Bayshore also hosting the first batch of Plus model flats.

There is an expectation – probably true in my opinion – that the government won’t allow something as important as its first Plus model launch site to flop. It also helps that it’s very close to East Coast beach, which provides an advantage the other two parcels don’t have. 

beach

With regard to Tengah, this is the rawest neighbourhood so far in Singapore. Most of Tengah is still conceptual, including the “car-lite” town idea. And in difficult situations like today, buyers as well as developers are less eager to bank on first-mover advantage. No one doubts the government can transform Tengah into a success, but the issue is how long it’s likely to take. 

Dairy Farm is more developed, and you can definitely see they’re trying to turn it into a private residential enclave; something on par with Bukit Timah in its earlier and less expensive days. But again, will developers be attracted to this quiet area, which draws a niche group of buyers (i.e., the sort who love the greenery enough to accept longer commutes and fewer urban conveniences)? 

For the first time in a decade, developers have the supply but not the interest. It’s exactly how I feel when I walk down Orchard Road these days: I’m impressed by the amount of things on offer, and I also have zero interest in buying anything I see. 

not buying

Meanwhile in other property news…

  • Where can you find the cheapest “young resale flats” near MRT stations? Here are some that are $740,000 or under
  • Which are the top BTO launch sites this year? Check out some of the best places to look. 
  • Did you know Korea has a rental system where you pay a big deposit, then never pay again and get the deposit back when you leave? Check out alternative housing systems that we might learn something from.
  • Landed homes from $660,000? It’s possible, if you want to retire and buy some place with a garden

Weekly Sales Roundup (10 June – 16 June)

Top 5 Most Expensive New Sales (By Project)

PROJECT NAME PRICE S$ AREA (SQFT) $PSF TENURE
MIDTOWN MODERN $5,488,000 1733 $3,167 99 yrs (2019)
WATTEN HOUSE $4,884,000 1539 $3,173 FH
IKIGAI $3,635,800 1604 $2,267 FH
PINETREE HILL $3,292,000 1292 $2,549 99 yrs
J’DEN $3,182,000 1259 $2,527 99 yrs

Top 5 Cheapest New Sales (By Project)

PROJECT NAME PRICE S$ AREA (SQFT) $PSF TENURE
HILLHAVEN $1,474,470 678 $2,174 99 yrs (2023)
THE LANDMARK $1,481,000 517 $2,866 99 yrs (2020)
THE MYST $1,572,000 678 $2,318 99 yrs
THE ARCADY AT BOON KENG $1,760,195 667 $2,638 FH
THE LAKEGARDEN RESIDENCES $1,900,000 926 $2,052 99 yrs (2023)

Top 5 Most Expensive Resale

PROJECT NAME PRICE S$ AREA (SQFT) $PSF TENURE
REFLECTIONS AT KEPPEL BAY $13,600,000 5576 $2,439 99 yrs (2006)
SKY@ELEVEN $5,900,000 2820 $2,092 FH
BEAVERTON COURT $5,880,000 3229 $1,821 FH
SILVERSEA $5,000,000 2530 $1,977 99 yrs (2007)
THE TRILLIUM $4,888,888 1798 $2,720 FH

Top 5 Cheapest Resale

PROJECT NAME PRICE S$ AREA (SQFT) $PSF TENURE
SMART SUITES $700,000 452 $1,548 FH
PARC BOTANNIA $750,888 431 $1,744 99 yrs (2016)
ISUITES @ TANI $790,000 624 $1,265 999 yrs (1883)
THE GLADES $810,000 452 $1,792 99 yrs (2013)
THE VUE $820,000 484 $1,693 FH

Top 5 Biggest Winners

PROJECT NAME PRICE S$ AREA (SQFT) $PSF RETURNS HOLDING PERIOD
SKY@ELEVEN $5,900,000 2820 $2,092 $3,097,000 17 Years
VIZ AT HOLLAND $2,900,000 1927 $1,505 $1,901,900 18 Years
EMERALD GARDEN $2,830,000 1259 $2,247 $1,860,000 21 Years
ASPEN HEIGHTS $2,950,000 1324 $2,228 $1,770,000 19 Years
MONTVIEW $2,500,000 1227 $2,037 $1,518,000 18 Years

Top 5 Biggest Losers

PROJECT NAME PRICE S$ AREA (SQFT) $PSF RETURNS HOLDING PERIOD
OUE TWIN PEAKS $3,330,000 1399 $2,380 -$1,105,000 14 Years
THE BERTH BY THE COVE $1,768,000 1152 $1,535 -$472,000 12 Years
OUE TWIN PEAKS $1,300,000 570 $2,279 -$299,371 8 Years
ALTEZ $1,080,000 603 $1,792 -$220,000 9 Years
CUBIK $2,480,000 2121 $1,170 -$200,000 15 Years

Transaction Breakdown

Type Of Sale Proportion NEWSLETTER 2

For more on the Singapore property market, follow us on Stacked.





Source link –

× How can I help you?